Playoff chair says 'Alabama was clearly the No. 4 team' and it wasn't that close
Kevin C. Cox/Getty Images
- The College Football Playoff is set and Alabama is in over Ohio State as the fourth team.
- Many felt Ohio State's conference championship and bigger wins should have gotten them in.
- The committee chair said Alamama was clearly better and that it wasn't close enough to consider tie-breakers like conference championships.
The College Football Playoff committee has spoken and Alabama is in over Ohio State as the fourth team and will play Clemson in the Sugar Bowl semifinal.
Bama-vs.-Ohio State was debated heavily following the conference championship games on Saturday. Ohio State had a conference championship and more impressive wins. But they also had something Alabama did not have, a second loss, an ugly 33-point debacle against Iowa.
The decision was also controversial because it means this year's playoff will have no teams from the Big Ten and the Pac-12, but will have two teams from the SEC, including one team that did not reach their conference championship game.
Matthew Holst/Getty Images
"We compared [Alabama's resume] to a 2-loss Ohio State team, obviously that one loss at home to No. 2-ranked Oklahoma," Hocutt said on ESPN. "But more damaging was the 33-point loss to unranked Iowa."
Hocutt went on to explain that Bama's "full body of work" was simply better and it sounded like the decision might not have been too tough at all.
"The selection committee just favored Alabama's full body of work over that of Ohio State, and it was consistent over the course of the year. As we saw Alabama play week in and week out, our rankings show when we start with a clean sheet of paper each and every week, that the selection committee believed that Alabama was the better football team ... When you looked at Ohio State - the win over Wisconsin, winning the Big Ten championship - When you looked at their resume, the wins they have over CFP top-25 teams, it was impressive, but it wasn't enough for the selection committee to place them over Alabama."
In the end, conference championships are supposed to be a bit of a tiebreaker if the teams are considered otherwise equal. In this case, the committee did not view the teams as equals.
"Alabama was clearly the No. 4 team in the country as a non-champion," Hocutt said. "In this case, the margins weren't close enough for us to look at those matters."
It is clear that one big thing working against Ohio State was simply that they were ranked all the way down at No. 8 entering Championship Saturday while Alabama was fifth. That alone should have been the biggest indicator that the committee did not think Ohio State was close to being a playoff team.
- US buys 81 Soviet-era combat aircraft from Russia's ally costing on average less than $20,000 each, report says
- 2 states where home prices are falling because there are too many houses and not enough buyers
- A couple accidentally shipped their cat in an Amazon return package. It arrived safely 6 days later, hundreds of miles away.
- Upcoming smartphones launching in India in May 2024
- Markets rebound in early trade amid global rally, buying in ICICI Bank and Reliance
- Women in Leadership
- Rupee declines 5 paise to 83.43 against US dollar in early trade
- Election Commission issues notification for sixth phase of Lok Sabha polls
- JNK India IPO allotment date
- JioCinema New Plans
- Realme Narzo 70 Launched
- Apple Let Loose event
- Elon Musk Apology
- RIL cash flows
- Charlie Munger
- Feedbank IPO allotment
- Tata IPO allotment
- Most generous retirement plans
- Broadcom lays off
- Cibil Score vs Cibil Report
- Birla and Bajaj in top Richest
- Nestle Sept 2023 report
- India Equity Market