The New York Times Skewers Obama's 'Slapdash' Legal Justification For Killing An American By Drone
A secret Obama administration memorandum detailing the legal justification for a 2011 drone strike in Yemen that killed New Mexico-born cleric and al-Qaeda propagandist Anwar al-Awlaki has been released.
The ACLU and the New York Times sued for its release, and NYT's Editorial Board has swiftly expressed its displeasure for the legal rationale used for dropping bombs on American citizens.
The Times states that "one might have expected a thoughtful memo that carefully weighed the pros and cons and discussed how such a strike accords with international and Constitutional law."
"Instead, the memo turns out to be a slapdash pastiche of legal theories - some based on obscure interpretations of British and Israeli law - that was clearly tailored to the desired result. Perhaps the administration held out so long to avoid exposing the thin foundation on which it based such a momentous decision."
The legal memo is dated July 2012, meaning that it was published eight months after the first known attempt to Awlaki in December 2009.
The Times explains that the government's main theory relies on the "public authorities justification," which is a legal concept for emergency situations that is the reason "why fire trucks can break the speed limit and police officers can fire at a threatening gunman."
The paper of record notes that the concept is "dangerous if expanded because it could be used to justify all kinds of government misdeeds." Consequently, much more about the decicion - like how the government knew Awlaki was planning "imminent" mayhem and no serious due process was possible - should be transparent.
The Times echoes Israel
Furthermore, while The Times notes that the memo does not question whether the Defense Department or CIA would follow international law, Guiora explained that the challenge in the targeted killing paradigm "is to identify the specific individual deemed a legitimate target and to implement the policy in a manner reflecting respect for international law."
Adding a dark subext, the Obama administration has not explained the drone strike that killed Awlaki's 16-year-old American son, Abdulrahman. The closest thing to a justification came from former White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs, who said that "I would suggest that you have a far more responsible father if they're truly concerned about the well being of your children."
- I'm an interior designer. Here are 10 things in your living room you should get rid of.
- A software engineer shares the résumé he's used since college that got him a $500,000 job at Meta — plus offers at TikTok and LinkedIn
- Higher-paid employees looking for work are having a tough time, and it could be a sign of a shift in the workplace
- Paneer snacks you can prepare in 30 minutes
- Markets crash: Investors' wealth erodes by ₹2.25 lakh crore
- Stay healthy and hydrated: 10 immunity-boosting fruit-based lemonades
- Here’s what you can do to recover after eating oily food
- AMD set to fuel growing demand for AI compute, says CTO
- Nothing Phone (2a) blue edition launched
- JNK India IPO allotment date
- JioCinema New Plans
- Realme Narzo 70 Launched
- Apple Let Loose event
- Elon Musk Apology
- RIL cash flows
- Charlie Munger
- Feedbank IPO allotment
- Tata IPO allotment
- Most generous retirement plans
- Broadcom lays off
- Cibil Score vs Cibil Report
- Birla and Bajaj in top Richest
- Nestle Sept 2023 report
- India Equity Market