Why The Hit On Nick Foles Is Absolutely A Dirty Play
Michael Perez/AP
Baker was ejected for the hit and many football fans were left complaining that the ruling was unfair, that Baker made what they are calling "a good football play," and that Foles should have been protecting himself.
Those who disagree with the call point to Foles being within close proximity of the runner making him a potential tackler and whether Foles was truly what we would consider a "defenseless player."
The fact is, according to the NFL rules, none of that matters.
A quarterback, by definition, is a "defenseless player" anytime there has been a change of possession, no matter where he is on the field, no matter what he is doing, and no matter what his posture actually is.
Here is Article 9 of Rule 12 (Player Conduct) in the NFL rule book:
So Foles was by definition "in a defenseless posture."
On top of that, the hit would have been illegal even if Foles wasn't a quarterback according to the very next line of the rule.
The hit by Baker was a "blindside block" as he was indeed moving "toward his own endline" (i.e. he was moving in the opposite direction that his team is going) and approached Foles "from behind or from the side." It doesn't matter that he actually hit the front of Foles as the rule only judges where the player approached from.
That provision makes the player "defenseless" no matter who it is or what position they play.
Ultimately, none of this means Baker is not allowed to block Foles. If Foles is considered a threat to the play, blocking him is absolutely legal. But what the defender cannot do is block him excessively.
This was excessive and unnecessary.
Furthermore, if there is any doubt, officials are always instructed to err on the side of player safety. That means if there is any doubt, the hit is illegal, not the other way around.
People may not like the rule but that is a different argument. According to how the rule is written now, the officials made the correct call and were well-within their rights to eject the player if they thought it was flagrant.
- US buys 81 Soviet-era combat aircraft from Russia's ally costing on average less than $20,000 each, report says
- 2 states where home prices are falling because there are too many houses and not enough buyers
- A couple accidentally shipped their cat in an Amazon return package. It arrived safely 6 days later, hundreds of miles away.
- Markets rebound sharply on buying in bank stocks firm global trends
- Bengaluru's rental income highest in Q1-2024, Mumbai next: Anarock report
- Rupee falls 10 paise to settle at 83.48 against US dollar
- Include 4 hrs of physical activity, 8 hrs sleep in routine for optimal health, suggests study
- 11 must-visit tourist places in Nainital in 2024
- JNK India IPO allotment date
- JioCinema New Plans
- Realme Narzo 70 Launched
- Apple Let Loose event
- Elon Musk Apology
- RIL cash flows
- Charlie Munger
- Feedbank IPO allotment
- Tata IPO allotment
- Most generous retirement plans
- Broadcom lays off
- Cibil Score vs Cibil Report
- Birla and Bajaj in top Richest
- Nestle Sept 2023 report
- India Equity Market