+

Cookies on the Business Insider India website

Business Insider India has updated its Privacy and Cookie policy. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the better experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we\'ll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the Business Insider India website. However, you can change your cookie setting at any time by clicking on our Cookie Policy at any time. You can also see our Privacy Policy.

Close
HomeQuizzoneWhatsappShare Flash Reads
 

'Justice was rendered, but it was not served': Kate Steinle's family reacts to murder suspect's acquittal

Dec 1, 2017, 11:24 IST

File - In this Sept. 1, 2015 file photo, from left, Brad Steinle, Liz Sullivan and Jim Steinle, the brother, mother and father of Kate Steinle who was shot to death on a pier, listen to their attorneys speak during a news conference on the steps of City Hall in San Francisco. The parents of a woman killed on a San Francisco pier by a man in the country illegally is suing the city and two federal agencies that they say contributed to her death. Kate Steinle's parents filed the wrongful-death lawsuit Friday, May 27, 2016. It accuses the San Francisco Sheriff's Department of failing to notify federal immigration officials that it was releasing Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez from jail.Eric Risberg/AP

Advertisement
  • A Mexican national was acquitted of murder charges in the killing of 32-year-old Kate Steinle.
  • Steinle's father said that his family wants to move on with their lives.
  • Steinle's death has been a politically-charged talking point for conservative groups that have called for stricter immigration enforcement.


When the jury's verdict in the trial of a Mexican national accused of murdering 32-year-old Kate Steinle was read Thursday, the Steinle family was reportedly absent from court, according to the San Francisco Chronicle.

"We just want to get this over with and move on with our lives, and think about Kate on our terms," said Jim Steinle, Kate's father, in the Chronicle. "Nothing's been on our terms. It's been on everyone else's terms."

Kate was fatally shot in the back by a stolen gun in the possession of Jose Ines Garcia Zarate, a Mexican national who was previously deported from the US five times and served in a federal prison. Zarate claimed that the shooting was an accident; that it happened after he picked up the gun.

'"We have never had a second of anger - not a moment," Jim told the Chronicle at one point during the interview. "Frustration, maybe, and sadness for sure, but no anger and no retaliation or vindictiveness or anything like that. We're not that kind of people."

Advertisement

"Even if this guy gets 100 years in prison, it doesn't solve anything, it doesn't help anything," Jim continued. "We would just like people to know ... that's the Steinles' feelings."

Conservative groups used Zarate's criminal record to argue that US immigration policies are inadequate, and called for stronger enforcement. Many have used the occasion to rally around Trump's proposal to build a wall along the US-Mexico border. Trump brought up the case many times during his 2016 election campaign.

In this July 7, 2015 file photo, Jose Ines Garcia Zarate, right, is led into the courtroom by San Francisco Public Defender Jeff Adachi, left, and Assistant District Attorney Diana Garciaor, center, for his arraignment at the Hall of Justice in San Francisco. A jury has reached a verdict Thursday, Nov. 30, 2017, in the trial of Mexican man at center of immigration debate in the San Francisco pier shooting.Michael Macor/San Francisco Chronicle via AP

But the jury viewed the case differently. Zarate was acquitted of the murder and manslaughter charges, and was found guilty of felony possession of a firearm, according to the Associated Press.

After the verdict, Trump tweeted: "A disgraceful verdict in the Kate Steinle case! No wonder the people of our Country are so angry with Illegal Immigration."

Advertisement

Following the jury's decision, Jim Steinle told the Chronicle he was "saddened and shocked."

"There's no other way you can coin it," he said. "Justice was rendered, but it was not served."

Jim, who held Kate after she was shot, said that the interview with the Chronicle would probably be his last. When people asked for his opinion on whether Zarate should be executed, he offered a poignant statement.

"I think Kate's gone," he told the San Francisco newspaper. "We're not going there. We don't have hate."

"We believe Kate's in a better place, and we think about her on that level," he continued. "But no, we have no vindictiveness."

Advertisement

Read the San Francisco Chronicle's full report here »

NOW WATCH: A Navy SEAL explains what to do if you're attacked by a dog

Next Article