Philadelphia's ultra-progressive DA candidate explains why local and city elections matter now more than ever
- The Philadelphia district attorney's race has generated a ton of press coverage in national publications like The New York Times, The Atlantic, and Business Insider.
- The frontrunner candidate, civil rights attorney Larry Krasner, says the race shows why local elections are so important.
- He argues that local officials hold incredible power over people's day-to-day lives and can push reform "upward" to the national level.
The Philadelphia district attorney race has generated an almost unheard of amount of press attention and enthusiasm for a local election, due in large part to frontrunner Larry Krasner's blunt platform.
He calls for an end to "mass incarceration," the constellation of state and federal policies that have put more than 2 million Americans behind bars.
By the end of the day Tuesday, Krasner could be the city's next district attorney, despite having spent his 30-year career defending activists and suing police for civil rights violations more than 75 times.
Krasner told Business Insider the enthusiasm around the Philadelphia DA race illustrates a deeper point about the increasing importance of local elections, particularly for those who believe the criminal justice system needs to be reformed - an increasingly mainstream view held by both conservatives and liberals cross the country.
DAs "have so much power to stay their hand or use an iron fist" on those involved in the criminal justice system, Krasner said, that electing progressive-minded people to the position makes "a tremendous difference."
Krasner isn't the only one to recognize the outsized impact that district attorneys can have on reform.
Over the last several years, criminal justice activists have centered their efforts around electing progressive district attorneys, an acknowledgement that DAs make the day-to-day decisions of what cases to pursue, what charges to press, and who gets a second chance.
Much of that push has been led by billionaire financier George Soros, and his "Safety and Justice" PACs, which funneled more than $3 million into seven DA races in 2016. The PACs reportedly put more than $1 million behind the Krasner campaign, a fact detractors have repeatedly seized upon.
Electing progressive DAs, according to Krasner, not only affects criminal justice in the cities they are elected in, but can also establish the legitimacy of reform efforts on a national level, provided those efforts are successful.
Here's how Krasner put it:
"If you have major cities with major mass incarceration problems, where progressive DAs are coming in, you are going to see big changes to mass incarceration in terms of the policies that are pursued.
And to the extent that those policies can prove themselves - which I believe they will - then you may see more of a national discussion and more of a legislative discussion about how science ... supports this change in the law."
Krasner said real reform, which he likened to "turning a giant ship in a bathtub," will only happen if it occurs first on the local or municipal level and is then driven upward.
"The only way [reform is] going to happen is if it's forced down some of [lawmakers'] throats," he said. "And it's going to be forced down some of their throats because the cities can turn out a vote and then, after some period of time, these policies will start to look sensible."
Philadelphia councilwoman Helen Gym, who was elected in 2015 on a progressive platform around education, said driving reform "upward" around any issue, be it criminal justice, education, or something else, generally has better results than waiting for the national government to act.
"At the local level, not only are you more likely to see a broader, more diverse representation; you have the possibility to really effectively change things," Gym told Business Insider. "When this change is shared across cities, we can see a lot of the issues and reforms we are looking for drive policy upward rather than the opposite way."