+

Cookies on the Business Insider India website

Business Insider India has updated its Privacy and Cookie policy. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the better experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we\'ll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the Business Insider India website. However, you can change your cookie setting at any time by clicking on our Cookie Policy at any time. You can also see our Privacy Policy.

Close
HomeQuizzoneWhatsappShare Flash Reads
 

The Fed might have buried a key policy signal to investors into its March statement

Mar 17, 2017, 22:16 IST

A tourists uses a video camera atop a Big Bus double-decker tour bus as the tour passes the Federal Reserve Building headquarters in Washington, on the second day of a U.S. government shutdown, October 2, 2013. REUTERS/Gary Cameron

Federal Reserve officials craft their policy statements knowing every word will be carefully scrutinized on Wall Street.

Advertisement

So when the Federal Open Market Committee, the Fed's policy-setting arm, added the word "symmetric" to a description of its official 2% inflation target, the central bank was clearly trying to send a signal.

The trouble with this kind of cryptic Fed transparency is that it often raises more questions than answers. What was the Federal Reserve trying to say?

Yellen was asked about the addition of the word during her post-meeting press conference, and she largely downplayed it.

But one explanation for the word's inclusion is that by emphasizing the symmetric nature of the inflation goal even as the Fed raised interest rates for the second time in four months, Fed Chair Yellen and her colleagues were telling the world, "we will be just as aggressive in fighting above target inflation as we were in fighting below target inflation."

Advertisement

Minneapolis Fed President Neel Kashkari, who dissented against the decision because he wanted to keep rates on hold, hinted at this when he offered an indication of the word's importance in a statement justifying his dissent.

"Importantly, we have said that 2% is a target, not a ceiling, so if we are under or over 2%, it should be equally concerning," Kashkari said.

Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis

UBS economist Samuel Coffin echoed this in his interpretation of the Fed's inclusion of the word symmetric to describe its inflation target.

"We think the FOMC is warning against thoughts that it might temporarily let the economy run hot or might countenance above-trend inflation for a time - the FOMC would be just as aggressive toward above-target inflation as it has been toward below-target inflation," Coffin wrote in a research note.

Advertisement

That could be key if, as some investors expect, global inflation finally does make a comeback this year and next.

NOW WATCH: 7 mega-billionaires who made a fortune last year

Please enable Javascript to watch this video
Next Article