Missouri executed a man who 'had, literally, a hole in his head'
His death at the hands of the government could violate the Constitution's ban on cruel and unusual punishment.
In 1972, Clayton, then 32, was sawing wood when a piece flew off the log and pierced his head. To save his life, doctors removed 20% of his frontal lobe, totalling 7.7% of his brain, according to a petition filed by his lawyers.
The frontal lobe is tied to impulse control and problem-solving, as The Times reported.
"Cecil Clayton had, literally, a hole in his head," Elizabeth Unger Carlyle, one of his attorneys, said in a statement.
As a result of the accident, Clayton suffers from dementia, depression, and general psychosis, including hallucinations, according to his lawyers. People, even Clayton's own family, made him so nervous, he couldn't stand to be around anyone, his doctor wrote in 1979.
Confused and anxious about his state of mind, he often yelled or became violent. Other medical records also document Clayton's pattern of concerning behavior.
"There was a profound change in him that he doesn't understand, and neither did his family," Elizabeth Unger Carlyle, one of Clayton's lawyers, told The New York Times.
In 1996, deputy sheriff Christopher Castetter responded to a domestic disturbance involving Clayton and his ex-girlfriend. Castetter was later found sitting in his patrol car with a bullet in his head. Clayton was arrested, found guilty, and sentenced to die for the murder.
Since then, however, the Missouri Supreme court has heard experts testify on five occasions that Clayton isn't competent enough to face execution. Even a psychiatrist, appointed by the Missouri Department of Corrections to assess his mental state, determined the same.
Regardless, the Missouri Supreme Court has ruled the state should proceed with the execution, set for Tuesday, March 17. Four of three justices found that since Clayton can understand why he's facing the death penalty, he's fit for his punishment.
In his final statement, Clayton did say: "They brought me up here to execute me."
In multiple cases, the US Supreme Court has ruled that executing an insane or mentally ill person violates the Eight Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment. The high court, however, has never truly specified a definition of mental illness, which leaves the interpretation up to individual states.
Clayton's lawyers also asked both the US Supreme Court and Gov. Jay Nixon to halt the execution. Neither cooperated.
- As Ilya Sutskever announces OpenAI exit, here’s a quick recap of his involvement in Sam Altman's firing last year
- DHFL scam, simplified: Here’s all about the Dheeraj Wadhawan case — allegedly India’s biggest banking loan fraud ever
- India-UK trade pact: Work in progress to resolve pending issues
- 5 most colourful mountains in the world
- Vivo takes the top spot in India: Top smartphone brands in Q1 2024
- Nothing Phone (2a) blue edition launched
- JNK India IPO allotment date
- JioCinema New Plans
- Realme Narzo 70 Launched
- Apple Let Loose event
- Elon Musk Apology
- RIL cash flows
- Charlie Munger
- Feedbank IPO allotment
- Tata IPO allotment
- Most generous retirement plans
- Broadcom lays off
- Cibil Score vs Cibil Report
- Birla and Bajaj in top Richest
- Nestle Sept 2023 report
- India Equity Market