BLOOMBERG COLUMNIST: Tesla's Clumsy Earnings Reports May Be Hiding Major Problems
Lucy Nicholson / REUTERS
Headline: Are There Cockroaches Under Tesla's Hood?
From the first paragraph Weil's point is clear - Tesla's consistent issues with clear reporting and accounting suggest something is amiss. "Sometimes Tesla acts like it doesn't know what it's doing when it comes to financial reporting," he writes.
Weil points to Tesla's Q3 earnings report as example after example of this clumsiness. The company reported third quarter earnings with a declaration that it had a "net income (non-GAAP) of $16 million."
The the company's earnings statement discussed nonstandard metrics until the 4th page before also reporting a $38 million loss under GAAP metrics.
The thing is, to the SEC this may not just be a 'whoops.' Agency regulation states that a company's financial disclosures must give GAAP numbers "equal or greater prominence" than non-GAAP numbers.
And in Tesla's case, there was a 40% difference between non-GAAP and GAAP revenue. That is because of the way the company calculates revenue from a financing program it started back in April, according to accounting research firm CFRA's Dan Mahoney.
Here's how it worked. In April, Tesla started a new financing program under which customers have the option to sell their vehicles back to the company after three years for guaranteed minimum amounts. The accounting rules say Tesla can't recognize all of the revenue immediately in those instances and must account for such transactions as leases. So after Tesla takes customers' cash, it records liabilities for "deferred revenue" and "resale value guarantee" on its balance sheet.
Mahoney noted two main problems with including so much of those amounts in non-GAAP revenue. Some customers wouldn't have chosen Tesla cars were it not for the financing program. So the non-GAAP revenue isn't comparable to Tesla's sales before the program began, and it may overstate the true growth and demand. Plus, by adding back the resale-value guarantee, the company "assumes that nobody is going to return the vehicle, for purposes of the non-GAAP revenue," he said.
Not good, and what's worse, as Weil points out, is that reporting like this is fodder for investors that believe in the cockroach theory - that when there's one problem, there's like another... and another... and another...
This is a must read for anyone interested in the Tesla story at all, so check out the full report at Bloomberg>
- Colon cancer rates are rising in young people. If you have two symptoms you should get a colonoscopy, a GI oncologist says.
- I spent $2,000 for 7 nights in a 179-square-foot room on one of the world's largest cruise ships. Take a look inside my cabin.
- An Ambani disruption in OTT: At just ₹1 per day, you can now enjoy ad-free content on JioCinema
- In second consecutive week of decline, forex kitty drops $2.28 bn to $640.33 bn
- SBI Life Q4 profit rises 4% to ₹811 crore
- IMD predicts severe heatwave conditions over East, South Peninsular India for next five days
- COVID lockdown-related school disruptions will continue to worsen students’ exam results into the 2030s: study
- India legend Yuvraj Singh named ICC Men's T20 World Cup 2024 ambassador
- JNK India IPO allotment date
- JioCinema New Plans
- Realme Narzo 70 Launched
- Apple Let Loose event
- Elon Musk Apology
- RIL cash flows
- Charlie Munger
- Feedbank IPO allotment
- Tata IPO allotment
- Most generous retirement plans
- Broadcom lays off
- Cibil Score vs Cibil Report
- Birla and Bajaj in top Richest
- Nestle Sept 2023 report
- India Equity Market