Here are the most jaw-dropping moments from the Gwyneth Paltrow ski collision trial, including the moment that literally made Paltrow's jaw drop

Paltrow testified during the trial, emphatically denying that she was at fault for the collision with Sanderson in 2016.

On the stand, Paltrow said that he was at fault and that she was left stunned after being struck in the back by Sanderson.

"I was confused at first, I froze, and I would say I got very upset a couple seconds later," Paltrow testified. "I didn't know if it was an intentional assault of a sexual nature, that was a quick thought that went through my head — is this a practical joke, is someone playing a practical joke?"

In a 2020 deposition read in court, Paltrow said that her initial reaction in anger was to tell Sanderson, "you skied directly into my fucking back."

Lawyers read deposition excerpts from Moses and Apple Martin, Paltrow's two children from a previous marriage with Coldplay frontman Chris Martin, who had been unable to testify in court due to scheduling issues.

They both claimed not to have witnessed the collision but recalled some colorful reactions post-crash from the "Goop" creator at a ski lodge, before she jetted off to a spa.

In a deposition, Paltrow's daughter Apple Martin, 18, said that she did not witness the crash but heard "some sort of screaming," in the distance, and was debriefed when her mother joined her and her instructor at the ski lodge at the end of the ski run 5 to 10 minutes after the collision.

"She told us what happened," Apple Martin said in the deposition. "She came in and I noticed she looked a bit shocked, and said 'this A-hole ran into me, ran right into my back.'"

At the ski lodge where they ate lunch after the collision, Apple Martin said they were joined by Paltrow's then-boyfriend and now-husband Brad Falchuk, her brother, and their ski instructors.

"She said she wouldn't ski for the rest of the day…she always stays on," Apple Martin said. "I never see her shaken up like that, and she had some sort of pain, and I remember that's why she went to the spa to get a massage."

In an odd exchange, one of Terry Sanderson's attorneys, Kristin Van Orman, asked Paltrow if she had requested $1 in damages after being inspired by Taylor Swift, who asked for the same symbolic sum when she won a sexual assault lawsuit in 2017.

"It's symbolic because the damages would actually be more," Paltrow said. Paltrow denied knowing about the dollar request from Swift, and also denied being close friends with the pop star.

Paltrow's courtroom looks took social media by storm, with The New York Times even labeling it "courtcore."

Celebrity stylist Sandra Okerulu told Insider that Paltrow's style choices gained so much attention because she didn't conform to the usual business formal attire one would expect a celebrity to wear to a trial.

"She's not trying to impress the jury," Okerulu said. "I think Gwyneth Paltrow is really focused on just being herself. It's just another day in the office."

When asked about why he felt the need to sue Paltrow for the collision, Sanderson launched into a bizarre rant about the importance of holding celebrities accountable, and the "pain of suing a celebrity."

"This is obviously an issue that someone needs to be accountable for," Sanderson told the court. "And if they're never accountable they're gonna do it again. Now we have the molesting of young children on an island, denial," he added before he was cut of by an objection from Paltrow's camp.

Sanderson appeared to refer to sex trafficker and philanthropist Jeffrey Epstein's private island, and a related QAnon conspiracy theory which claims that liberal Hollywood and political elites run a global pedophilia ring, according to NPR.

Sanderson emailed his daughters hours after the crash, telling them "I'm famous."

The evidence was introduced during the trial to show that Sanderson made light of the incident after colliding with Paltrow, and was not as injured as he claimed to be.

Following the "Goop" founder's testimony, during which she said she was not typically accident-prone, Sanderson lawyer Kristin Van Orman zeroed in on Paltrow's comments about her stability and said she wanted to ask the actress about statements she previously made during an appearance on "Jimmy Kimmel Live!" in which she said she was always bumping into things.

"She's lied under oath a number of times," Van Orman said in court on Friday.

Cameras inside the courtroom captured Paltrow's immediate response as she dropped her jaw in apparent disbelief at the accusation.

"We believe she ran into things as she always does," Van Orman continued.

Paltrow had described Sanderson as a "large man" hitting her on the slope, which his attorney picked apart in questioning. Paltrow told Sanderson's lawyer that she measured 5' 10".

"I am so jealous... I have to wear four-inch heels just to make it to 5'5," Kristin Van Orman said. In later testimony she had Sanderson stand by her to show that he was around 5'5".

"I'm definitely on the small side," Sanderson said.

"There was a reason I asked Ms. Paltrow why she was 5' 10" last week," Van Orman quipped.