25 US cities where housing is affordable, people work less, and there's plenty to do
25. Seattle, Washington
Percent of income spent on housing: 28.4%
Average weeks worked per year: 39
Entertainment density: 1.8%
23 (TIE). Minneapolis, Minnesota
Percent of income spent on housing: 26.7%
Average weeks worked per year: 38.6
Entertainment density: 1.8%
23 (TIE). Austin, Texas
Percent of income spent on housing: 31.5%
Average weeks worked per year: 38.4
Entertainment density: 2%
21 (TIE). Raleigh, North Carolina
Percent of income spent on housing: 29.5%
Average weeks worked per year: 37.8
Entertainment density: 1.6%
21 (TIE). Louisville, Kentucky
Percent of income spent on housing: 24.2%
Average weeks worked per year: 36.2
Entertainment density: 1.7%
20. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Percent of income spent on housing: 22.9%
Average weeks worked per year: 35
Entertainment density: 1.7%
19. Scottsdale, Arizona
Percent of income spent on housing: 25.6%
Average weeks worked per year: 37.6
Entertainment density: 1.3%
18. Richmond, Virginia
Percent of income spent on housing: 27.8%
Average weeks worked per year: 33.4
Entertainment density: 1.8%
17. Durham, North Carolina
Percent of income spent on housing: 25.9%
Average weeks worked per year: 36.1
Entertainment density: 1.7%
16. St. Paul, Minnesota
Percent of income spent on housing: 29.3%
Average weeks worked per year: 36.5
Entertainment density: 1.8%
15. Honolulu, Hawaii
Percent of income spent on housing: 37.4%
Average weeks worked per year: 37.5
Entertainment density: 1.2%
14. Wichita, Kansas
Percent of income spent on housing: 24.6%
Average weeks worked per year: 35.5
Entertainment density: 1.4%
13. Corpus Christi, Texas
Percent of income spent on housing: 27.9%
Average weeks worked per year: 34.7
Entertainment density: 1.3%
12. Cincinnati, Ohio
Percent of income spent on housing: 22.4%
Average weeks worked per year: 36
Entertainment density: 1.5%
11. Winston-Salem, North Carolina
Percent of income spent on housing: 24.4%
Average weeks worked per year: 32.3
Entertainment density: 1.6%
10. Nashville, Tennessee
Percent of income spent on housing: 31.1%
Average weeks worked per year: 38
Entertainment density: 4.4%
9. Reno, Nevada
Percent of income spent on housing: 27.9%
Average weeks worked per year: 37.8
Entertainment density: 2%
8. Columbus, Ohio
Percent of income spent on housing: 27.6%
Average weeks worked per year: 36.6
Entertainment density: 1.3%
7. Lubbock, Texas
Percent of income spent on housing: 30.3%
Average weeks worked per year: 34.3
Entertainment density: 1.2%
6. Lexington, Kentucky
Percent of income spent on housing: 25.8%
Average weeks worked per year: 36.4
Entertainment density: 1.9%
5. Boise, Idaho
Percent of income spent on housing: 26.6%
Average weeks worked per year: 37.6
Entertainment density: 1.5%
4. Henderson, Nevada
Percent of income spent on housing: 29.1%
Average weeks worked per year: 35.4
Entertainment density: 2.4%
3. Omaha, Nebraska
Percent of income spent on housing: 26.6%
Average weeks worked per year: 38.1
Entertainment density: 1.7%
2. Lincoln, Nebraska
Percent of income spent on housing: 25.1%
Average weeks worked per year: 39.5
Entertainment density: 1.5%
1. Madison, Wisconsin
Percent of income spent on housing: 27.7%
Average weeks worked per year: 37.1
Entertainment density: 2.2%
Next Story
Bajaj Chetak Urbane electric scooter with 113 km range to hit the roads starting ₹1.15 lk
Cyclone 'Michaung' alert in the Tirupati, Nellore, Prakasam, Bapatla, Krishna, West Godavari, Konaseema, and Kakinada of AP Districts
Gold surges Rs 450 to hit record high of Rs 64,300 per 10 gm
