Business Insider India has updated its Privacy and Cookie policy. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the better experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we\'ll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the Business Insider India website. However, you can change your cookie setting at any time by clicking on our Cookie Policy at any time. You can also see our Privacy Policy.
I compared fish sandwiches from 4 major fast-food chains, and all of them were terrible except one
I compared fish sandwiches from 4 major fast-food chains, and all of them were terrible except one
Irene JiangFeb 25, 2020, 22:00 IST
Fish isn't usually people's first-choice protein when eating at fast-food restaurants.
But with Lent on the horizon and with pescatarians in mind, we tried all of the fast-food fish sandwiches we could get our hands on to find the very best one.
Out of Arby's, Dairy Queen, McDonald's, and Burger King, we found that Burger King had the only fish sandwich that we kind of enjoyed.
Let's be real - fish isn't usually the first choice of protein at a fast-food restaurant.
Advertisement
It's kind of hard to screw up beef. Even overcooked, from-frozen beef is acceptable. But if fish isn't done just right, it's downright offensive. Imagine paying four to six bucks for a sandwich and biting into a tough, rancid fillet that stains your mouth with its fishy odor.
Luckily for you, you don't have to do that - because I already did.
For Lent, when Catholics abstain from eating meat on Fridays, and for our perennial pescatarians, I ate all the fast-food fish sandwiches available to filter out the very worst ones. After putting my stomach and taste buds through some mild suffering, I found my answer.
I started at Arby's, where I ordered the crispy fish sandwich ($3.79).
It featured an outsized triangular slab of fish slapped between two rather impressive sesame seed buns.
But balance is the key to a good sandwich, and this one was short on lettuce and sauce.
The fish itself tasted gritty and pungent. White fish shouldn't taste very fishy, but this did. Hard pass.
Next, I went to Dairy Queen, where I ordered the crispy fish sandwich ($6.39).
The bun was small and plain, the fish fillet also triangular for some reason.
This sandwich's combination of lettuce, tartar sauce, and crispy, inoffensive fish was, at first bite, much better than Arby's.
But then I made the mistake of tasting each component individually. Turns out tartar sauce is an effective cover-up for other not-so-fresh flavors.
Next, I tried the original fast-food fish sandwich: McDonald's Filet-O-Fish ($4.59).
It was much smaller and much plainer than the other two sandwiches.
The fish was crispy outside with the same frozen gritty texture inside. But thankfully, it had no fishy flavor whatsoever. In fact, it had very little flavor at all.
The tartar sauce does most of the heavy lifting in that department. For McDonald's, that's pretty par for the course.
My last port of call was Burger King, where I ordered the Big Fish sandwich ($6.49).
Out of all the sandwiches, this was the most sophisticated. It had pickles and a sweet brioche bun.
The fillet had the thickest batter of all, but the fish inside was just fine.
The crunch of the pickle, crispy fish, and tartar sauce all worked together for the most flavorful — albeit salty — bite of the day.
Overall, it was clear that Burger King was the Popeyes of the fish sandwich, not least because of its pickles and sweet brioche bun. It had by far the most interesting flavors and the crispiest fish. I'd keep a cup of water handy, though.
For those with less adventurous palettes, the Filet-O-Fish remains a solid if uninspiring choice for the fast-food-loving fish eater.
Note: At the time this taste test was conducted, Chick-fil-A's and Wendy's fish sandwiches were not yet available.
