Tesla hit with a new lawsuit that alleges a pregnant woman was pinned against the wall by her Model X breaking her bones and sending her into premature labor

Advertisement
Tesla hit with a new lawsuit that alleges a pregnant woman was pinned against the wall by her Model X breaking her bones and sending her into premature labor

Advertisement
Mallory Harcourt and family with Model X

Mallory Harcourt

Mallory Harcourt and family the day they purchased their Model X.

  • A new lawsuit filed against Tesla alleges a California woman was sent into premature labor after her brand new Tesla Model X did an unintended acceleration while she was in front of the vehicle, pinning her against the wall of her garage. She was eight months pregnant at the time, and her 2-year-old son was in the car.
  • She is now suing Tesla alleging that Tesla knew that the Model X had issues, and that Tesla was negligent in designing the car without proper sensors and other safety measures.
  • In a response to Harcourt's attorney, Tesla said that the car responded "as designed" during the incident and that company data shows that someone pressed the brake, shifted the car into drive, and hit the accelerator to engage it. Tesla said in the letter that some of these actions were caused by Harcourt's son, who was in the vehicle at the time of the incident.  
  • Tesla declined to comment for this story. 
  • Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.

A California woman named Mallory Harcourt is suing Tesla after she alleges her brand new 2019 Model X SUV did an unintended acceleration (UA) and pinned her to the wall in her garage. The suit was filed on May 17th.

According to the lawsuit, Harcourt was eight months pregnant at the time and the accident sent her into premature labor after breaking her bones. She had just come home from the grocery store and Harcourt's two-year-old, B.H., was in the car as this was happening, according to the lawsuit. 

Here's how it happened, according to the lawsuit:

  • Harcourt's family purchased the Tesla Model X on December 23, 2018.
  • On December 27th Harcourt exited the car upon returning home from shopping and opened the car's falcon winged doors to remove her groceries and B.H. from the back.
  • She took her son inside to change his diaper, but he ran back into the car in the driver's seat. The vehicle was in park.
  • As Harcourt moved in front of the Model X to remove B.H. the car accelerated, pinning her against the wall with its doors still open, according to the suit.
  • The suit claims the acceleration lifted Harcourt off of her feet and pinned her against the wall. B.H. started crying and Harcourt called to her neighbors for help. The neighbors called an ambulance and Harcourt went to the hospital where she went into premature labor with her daughter.

Read more: A Tesla Model X driver claims her car crashed into a gym after she hit the brakes - but similar incidents point to a different explanation

Advertisement

Unintended acceleration

Unintended accelerations are not unheard of in the automotive industry. The lawsuit cites a case from 2013 where an Oklahoma jury rendered a verdict in favor of plaintiffs who alleged that software issues with their Toyota caused an unintended acceleration, killing one person and injuring another. 

Harcourt's suit alleges that Tesla's poor Model X design is at fault here. The lawsuit claims the car lacks proper driver's occupancy seat sensors, control logic to ensure all doors are closed before acceleration, a simultaneously pushed button on the shifting mechanism to engage the car's drive system, and/or necessary control logic to prevent an unintended acceleration or reversal. 

To put a Model X into drive and accelerate it, a driver should have to hit the brake and click down the controls on the steering column to move it from park to drive. Then, the driver would have to move their foot from the brake to the accelerator, just as with any car. 

Harcourt also alleges in the lawsuit that Tesla knew that its Model X was faulty, and that the company encouraged its agents to say that it was a perfectly safe car for her and her family despite knowing that it had design flaws. The lawsuit also cites that numerous incidents of unintended acceleration in Tesla vehicles have been reported to the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration, and the rate of those complaints is even higher than Toyota's. 

Harcourt's attorney, Alison Gokal, sent Tesla a letter in February acknowledging that B.H. had lodged himself between the accelerator and driver's seat, but that "very minor changes in code, design and manufacturing" could have prevented the unintended acceleration incident.

Advertisement

Gokal told Business Insider that Tesla has so far declined to share any information about the car's diagnostic log during the incident. But in a response to a letter Gorkal sent on February 21st, the company did describe the events based on what it recorded in the log.  

According to Tesla's letter, the company concluded that its data showed that the vehicle "responded to the operator's inputs, as designed," and said that some of the inputs came from Harcourt's son. 

Here's how it went down according to Tesla's letter:

  • About nine seconds after someone entered the car, the brake was pushed, the driver's door closed, and the gear shift was put into drive.
  • Then over the next six seconds the brake, and then the accelerator were pressed.
  • "Over the next 2 seconds, as the accelerator pedal continued to be pressed ranging from 44% to 98%," Tesla said in its statement to Harcourt's attorney.
  • Tesla continued: "...the brake pedal was briefly pressed, prompting the vehicle to issue a user message advising that both pedals were being pressed; at this time, pressing the brake overrode the accelerator pedal such that the motor torque being commanded by the accelerator pedal input was appropriately suppressed."
  • Over the next four seconds, the accelerator and the brake both were pressed, according to Tesla.

Tesla also informed Harcourt that it does not have insurance that applies to this particular situation and has said that it will only repurchase the car from her at resale value. 

After a similar incident in April of 2018 - when a Model X crashed into a gym after the driver reportedly hit the brake - a Tesla spokesperson said that in every case when a driver has 'suddenly' and 'unexpectedly' accelerated that the company has dealt with, the driver was at fault.

Advertisement

"Accidents involving 'pedal misapplication,' in which a driver presses the accelerator pedal by mistake, occur in all types of vehicles, not just Teslas. The accelerator pedals in Tesla vehicles have two redundant sensors that clearly show us when the pedal is physically pressed down, such as by the driver's foot," they said.

Read the full lawsuit below: 

 

If you have ever experienced an unintended acceleration in a Tesla, or have worked on solving that problem at Tesla or any other car company, email me at llopez@businessinsider.com.

Exclusive FREE Report: The Self-Driving Car Race by Business Insider Intelligence

Advertisement

Harcourt v Tesla by on Scribd

{{}}