Why the US presidential election is going to be determined by a bunch of cavemen
YouTube/GEICO Insurance
Science suggests that we generally gravitate toward political candidates who, like Obama, can bust out the baritone. Now, a new study helps illuminate why: We perceive deep-voiced leaders as physically stronger and more competent.
The researchers say it probably comes down to evolution. Even if there's no plausible reason why the US president needs to be able to fend off a lion attack, this was an important attribute back in our caveman days. And that age-old impulse to select the strongest-seeming leader is hard to shake.
The study, led by researchers at the University of Miami and Duke University, started from the hypothesis that we select deeper-voiced leaders because they're typically older and wiser. To test that theory, they conducted two experiments.
Sure enough, results of the first experiment showed that participants were most likely to vote for hypothetical candidates in their 40s and 50s when they received written information about their age and sex.
"That's when leaders are not so young that they're too inexperienced, but not so old that their health is starting to decline or they're no longer capable of active leadership," lead study author Casey Klofstad, Ph.D., said in a release.
That 40 to 60 age range also happens to be the time when our voice reaches its lowest pitch.
In a second experiment, the researchers had participants listen to recorded male and female voices saying, "I urge you to vote for me this November," in different pitches. Participants were asked to assess the strength and competence of the people whose voices they heard, and also to report who they would vote for.
As expected, the candidates with deeper voices won 60% to 76% of the votes - but the participants' judgments of strength and competence mattered much more than how old they thought the speakers were.
In other words, at least on a conscious level, we aren't voting for deep-voiced candidates just because we think they're older and wiser. We value the image of strength and competence even more. Men and women with lower-pitched voices usually have higher levels of the hormone testosterone, meaning they're likely stronger and more aggressive.
Reuters
This phenomenon appears outside the lab, too: The researchers found that candidates with lower-pitched voices were more likely to win in the 2012 US House of Representatives elections.
The study also notes that women's typically higher-pitched voices could put them at a disadvantage in the elections. (Margaret Thatcher was said to have taken speech lessons to help lower her voice before running for prime minister.) Still, the authors caution that this idea can't entirely explain why there are more men in office.
The real golden-ticket question is whether lower-voiced leaders really are more skilled and capable in the ways that we need them to be today. The study authors plan to conduct future research to explore this idea.
"If it turns out that people with lower voices are actually poorer leaders, then it's bad that voters are cuing into this signal if it's not actually a reliable indicator of leadership ability," Klofstad said in the release.
Yet by becoming more attuned to these biases, we may be able to prevent them from influencing - and potentially sabotaging - our voting decisions.
- 2 states where home prices are falling because there are too many houses and not enough buyers
- US buys 81 Soviet-era combat aircraft from Russia's ally costing on average less than $20,000 each, report says
- A couple accidentally shipped their cat in an Amazon return package. It arrived safely 6 days later, hundreds of miles away.
- 9 health benefits of drinking sugarcane juice in summer
- 10 benefits of incorporating almond oil into your daily diet
- From heart health to detoxification: 10 reasons to eat beetroot
- Why did a NASA spacecraft suddenly start talking gibberish after more than 45 years of operation? What fixed it?
- ICICI Bank shares climb nearly 5% after Q4 earnings; mcap soars by ₹36,555.4 crore
- Nothing Phone (2a) blue edition launched
- JNK India IPO allotment date
- JioCinema New Plans
- Realme Narzo 70 Launched
- Apple Let Loose event
- Elon Musk Apology
- RIL cash flows
- Charlie Munger
- Feedbank IPO allotment
- Tata IPO allotment
- Most generous retirement plans
- Broadcom lays off
- Cibil Score vs Cibil Report
- Birla and Bajaj in top Richest
- Nestle Sept 2023 report
- India Equity Market