An Obama-era rule that could reshape the massive retirement savings industry may be heading to the Supreme Court
Michael Steele/Getty Images
Michael Steele/Getty Images
- In 2016, the Obama administration and the Department of Labor rolled out the fiduciary rule which made investment advice standards for retirement savings tougher.
- The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals determined the rule was outside of the scope of the Department of Labor's purview and was illegal.
- In contrast, the 10th Circuit Court of Appeal determined upheld the rule on Tuesday.
- The conflict could send the rule to the Supreme Court.
The Obama-era rule that raises the standards for retirement investment advice may be headed for the Supreme Court after a ruling on Thursday.The Department of Labor's fiduciary rule, which requires investment advisers to recommend the best product for their clients, was struck down in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals by a 2 to 1 ruling. At the same time, the rule was upheld in the 10th Circuit, meaning the decision will likely get pushed to the Supreme Court.
The Obama administration argued that investment advisers were recommending investments that were less than perfect to clients because they received higher commissions on those products. According to a study by Obama's Council of Economic Advisers, conflicted financial advisers' advice costs American families roughly $17 billion a year.In the Fifth Circuit, the judges determined that the Department of Labor (DOL) overstepped their bounds.
"The majority opinion was a stinging criticism of the rule," Ed Mills, a Washington Policy analyst at Raymond James said in a note to clients Friday. "The court found that the DOL exceeded their authority to enact regulation implementing the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) and questioned why the DOL chose to undergo a complete overhaul of the regulations more than 40-years after its passage without specific direction from Congress."The court also determined the post-financial crisis Dodd-Frank Act established that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) rather than the DOL should technically maintain purview over issues such as the fiduciary rule according to Mills.On Tuesday, however, the 10th Circuit Court upheld the rule and determined the DOL was within its regulatory jurisdiction in imposing the rule.
"The conflict between circuits increases the likelihood that this will be appealed to the Supreme Court," Mills wrote.
- India registers 1,61,736 new COVID-19 cases and 879 deaths in last 24 hours
- RBI’s G-SAP 1.0 is certainly a much needed demand lever to support the government borrowing programme
- Elon Musk-owned internet service Starlink’s India entry under scrutiny of DoT, report suggests
- Air conditioner and cooling brand Voltas India eyes double digit growth this summer
- Gautam Adani and Mukesh Ambani cumulatively lost nearly $7 billion as the markets plunged