'Friday night document massacre': Democrats slam White House for withholding 100,000 documents on Trump's Supreme Court nominee

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

• Democrats hit back over the weekend against a White House decision to withhold more than 100,000 pages of records from Judge Brett Kavanaugh's time as a lawyer from the Senate days ahead of his confirmation hearing.
• The records detail Kavanaugh's time serving under former President George W. Bush, whose lawyers issued the decision to the White House, citing "constitutional privilege."
• Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer tweeted Saturday that the unprecedented decision "has all the makings of a cover up."
• Republicans have dismissed Democrats' concerns over the limited access.

Democrats criticized the Trump administration over the weekend for refusing to release thousands of documents on Brett Kavanaugh ahead of this week's upcoming Senate hearings on his nomination to the US Supreme Court.

Kavanaugh, nominated by President Donald Trump, worked in the White House under former President George W. Bush, whose lawyers combed through documents from that time and decided that 27,000 of them were protected under "constitutional privilege."

The White House directed them Friday not to hand them over to the Senate Judiciary Committee, one of Bush's lawyers said in a letter to the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, which will host the hearings scheduled to start on Tuesday.

Another 102,000 pages of documents related to Kavanaugh's record were not turned over for other reasons. The committee has had access to more than 415,000 pages on Kavanaugh's background, the lawyer said in the letter.

Dick Durbin, the No. 2 Senate Democrat, said in an interview aired on "Fox News Sunday" that the White House's citation of privilege on the documents was the first time that had occurred.

"There has been more concealment of documents that are concerning his public service and his position on issues than ever in the history of the United States ... If he's so proud of his conservative credentials, show us the record," Durbin said.

Democratic Sen. Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota, a Judiciary Committee member, echoed Durbin's concerns in an interview with NBC's "Meet the Press" on Sunday, saying, "This is not normal."

Wikipedia; Chip Somodevilla/Getty; Skye Gould/Business Insider

Kavanaugh must win 51 of the 100-seat Senate votes to approve his nomination.

Klobuchar said the documents that she's seen raise "some very interesting questions" about Kavanaugh's background, but she couldn't discuss the contents of the documents.

"I think that you could ask some very interesting questions about these documents that I'm unable to even say," she said, adding that she was concerned about Kavanaugh's views on executive power and a president's eligibility to be investigated.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer tweeted Saturday that the unprecedented decision "has all the makings of a cover up."

"We're witnessing a Friday night document massacre," the New York senator wrote. "President Trump's decision to step in at the last moment and hide 100k pages of Judge Kavanaugh's records from the American public is not only unprecedented in the history of SCOTUS noms, it has all the makings of a cover up."

Republicans have dismissed Democrats' concerns over lack of access to portions of the record on Kavanaugh's background, arguing their criticism is politically motivated.

"Democrats have more than enough information to understand that this is a highly qualified jurist that should be the next Supreme Court justice," Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, a Republican, said in an interview on ABC's "This Week."

Trump nominated Kavanaugh to be a justice on the US Supreme Court to replace the retiring Justice Anthony Kennedy on July 9.

Kavanaugh must win a majority of the 100-seat Senate to approve his nomination. Most Republicans, who hold a slim majority in the chamber, are expected to back him.