Taxation and industry experts cheer the potential withdrawal of retrospective tax
retrospective taxwas introduced by late former president Pranab Mukherjee in 2012.
- It enabled the government to tax profits from earlier years even though they were not taxable at the time.
- The bill is yet to pass in the parliament, nonetheless, it has brought some cheer among industry and taxation experts.
The amendment to the Income Tax act enabled the Indian government to impose tax on any capital gains resulting from the transfer of shares from a foreign entity, whose assets were located in India. In other words, the government could tax profits from earlier years — back to 1962 — even though they were not taxable at the time.
The policy impacted companies like UK-based Cairn Energy and telecom giant
AdvertisementIndia’s Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman introduced ‘ The Taxation Law (Amendment) Bill, 2021 in Lok Sabha on Thursday, August 5. It also said that the government would refund the money collected to enforce such levies.
The bill is yet to pass in the parliament. Nonetheless it seems to have brought some cheer among industry and taxation experts.
Retrospective Tax Law To Go, Refunds Possible For Cairn, Vodafone - kudos to
The IT Act amendment to nullify the regressive retrospective tax law introduced in 2012 is a bold and hugely positive development. It goes a long way in enhancing our global credibility and predictability, making India even more friendlier to the global investment community. — Amitabh Kant, CEO of government think tank NITI Aayog
It's something that all you taxpayers expect you to live with. No taxpayers are ever happy to be imposed a tax on this past activity. You have to do your tax payments every year, as you earn the income, as you make the sale. Nobody wants to be surprised — three, four, five years later— by some government officials, coming through a door and saying that you have to pay an extra tax on what you did five years ago. So there's no country in the world where Retrospective taxation is a principle that is to be encouraged. To my knowledge, if the only rare exception. countries adopt the policy of retrospective taxation. — Satya Poddar, Tax Policy Advisor at EY
This is definitely something which will solve many things particularly some of the things. So to that extent it's really pragmatic. We obviously need to get into details of how it will pay out. But, on the outset this is a welcome move and I'm sure it will be appreciated around the world. This issue, as you know, on this indirect transfer has been a matter of debate that has taken place regarding India, all around the world. So I think this is something that could be seen as a step in the right direction. And certainly a very welcome move. — Rajeev Dimri, Head of Tax, KPMG
This is indeed a very progressive step, undoing something which has been a sore point for investors but has not yielded anything to the government. — Dinesh Kanabar, CEO, Dhruva Advisors
Advertisement“Any existing demands are also proposed to be nullified subject to withdrawal of pending litigation and the taxpayer agreeing to forego interest, costs and damages. Refunds too shall be handed out without interest. This is indeed a very pragmatic step by the Government and should help it contain the withspread litigation in cases similar to
Google is now using Chrome as an added security layer for account sign-ins
Glenmark Life Sciences IPO: How to check allotment status, listing date and more
Popular on BI
- GST Council meet: No new tax on food delivery apps Swiggy, Zomato
- SBI, Kotak Mahindra and others cut home loan rates ahead of festive season
- Virat Kohli's T20I journey as captain is better than Dhoni's
- Gen Z decoded: MTV's latest report reflects Gen Z’s behavior patterns,mindsets, habits and perceptions
- From ecommerce to payments — here are the top funded business models of last one year