China outplayed the world on the day it was meant to face a reckoning over its coronavirus response
AFP/South China Morning Post/YouTube
- The World Health Assembly began on Monday, with dozens of countries looking to hold
Chinaaccountable over the coronavirusoutbreak.
- It would likely have embarrassed China on the world stage, casting its response in an unflattering light.
- But China ended up sidestepping that. President
Xi Jinpingdeftly embraced a watered-down investigation likely to spare China any humiliation.
- He also made a high-profile pledge of $2 billion to the WHO, plus more aid to countries in need.
- At the same time, President
Donald Trumprefused to speak at the assembly and threatened to withdraw totally. US funding for the WHO is already on hold.
- China moved nimbly on the world stage, and made a show of generosity, while the US appeared small-minded and reluctant to lead.
China was meant to face a reckoning this week over its early coronavirus response, outnumbered in public by dozens of angry nations at the World Health Assembly. Instead, it ended up outplaying the world.
View all Offers
View all Offers
- 11% OFF
Tecno POVA 2 (Polar Silver, 4GB RAM, 64GB Storage)| 7000mAh Battery | 48MP Camera | Helio G85₹ 11999₹ 13499Buy On
- 6% OFF
OnePlus 9 5G (Arctic Sky, 8GB RAM, 128GB Storage)₹ 46999₹ 49999Buy On
Redmi Note 10 (Aqua Green, 4GB RAM, 64GB Storage)₹ 13999₹ 15999Buy On
- 31% OFF
Apple iPhone XR (64GB) - Black₹ 32999₹ 47900Buy On
- 10% OFF
Redmi Note 10 Pro (Dark Night, 6GB RAM, 128GB Storage) -120hz Super Amoled Display|64MPwith 5mp Super Tele-Macro₹ 17999₹ 19999Buy On
At Monday's virtual World Health Assembly, countries were meant to vote on a draft motion, proposed by Australia, which would begin an investigation into the source of the novel coronavirus and China's role in the outbreak.
AdvertisementIt would have cast an unflattering light on China's early inaction, and its suppression of information, which cost valuable days of preparation.
But that motion didn't even make it to the table.
Instead, the assembly was presented with a watered-down draft from the European Union, which calls for a review on "lessons learned" with few specifics.
In other words, the new version does not call for an investigation into the origins of the virus in China. At no point does it mention by name China, or Wuhan, where the first cases were found.
Around 122 WHO member states have now backed the draft.
AdvertisementAs it became clear the motion was going to pass, China reversed its earlier opposition and instead embraced it. The WHO is expected to pass the motion on Tuesday, especially since it now has China's backing.
President Xi Jinping on Monday also gave a surprisingly conciliatory speech to the assembly, in which:
- Xi backed an investigation into the virus — but only when the pandemic is over.
AdvertisementDozens of nations around the world are still in the midst of their outbreaks, which means this criterion is unlikely to be met any time soon, especially with no vaccine. Many countries that eased restrictions, including Germany and China itself, had to partially reimpose them when new cases resurfaced.
- He worded his pledge in such a way that countries will struggle to hold China to account.
The omission of the word "independent" is telling, as CNN's James Griffiths noted.
Carrying out independent investigations in China is notoriously difficult, especially if it could embarrass the ruling Communist Party.
When international bodies demanded access to Xinjiang, home to the beleaguered Uighur Muslims, China gave heavily choreographed and chaperoned tours and forbade researchers and journalists from investigating independently.
AdvertisementIf this is a glimpse into how a coronavirus investigation will look like, the world will struggle to hold China to account.
- Xi announced an additional $2 billion in funding to the WHO, with a focus on developing countries.
The top contributor used to be the US. But President Donald Trump withdrew $400 million in US funding earlier this year to protest what he called the WHO leadership's "China-centric" nature.
On Monday, White House National Security Council spokesman John Ullyot called the $2 billion injection "a token to distract from calls from a growing number of nations demanding accountability for the Chinese government's failure to ... warn the world of what was coming."
Throughout the pandemic, the WHO has praised China's response to its outbreak — despite widespread reports of a cover-up — and repeatedly rejected accusations that it is too close to China.
- He pledged to help African nations better their healthcare systems, and promised that any Chinese vaccine development "will be made a global public good."
Even early reports of such a move invited accusations that the US cares more for its pharmaceuticals industry than for impoverished COVID-19 sufferers.
It follows a public spat after French drug-maker Sanofi reversed a pledge to give the US priority access after pressure from the French government.
AdvertisementChina, meanwhile, has in recent weeks been crafting an image for itself as a global benefactor in the virus fight, rather than the country where the virus originated.
It has sent medical supplies around the world, and pledged Monday to start an exchange with 30 hospitals in Africa, and help accelerate the construction of the Africa CDC headquarters.
Experts have overwhelmingly dismissed these acts as a propaganda stunt, but it is undeniable that China is making a play for global leadership when few other nations seem willing.
Trump made it easier for China to claim victoryAs China made grand pledges at the World Health Assembly, Trump went on the offensive.
He rejected an invitation to speak at the assembly, sending instead Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar, who went on to blame the WHO for failing to warn the world about COVID-19 in its early days.
Advertisement"In an apparent attempt to conceal this outbreak, at least one member state made a mockery of their transparency obligations, with tremendous costs for the entire world," he said, in a clear reference to China.
As Business Insider's John Haltiwanger has noted, the fact that Trump declined to speak at the assembly — while Xi did — also shows that the US is pulling away from its responsibilities on the world stage.
AdvertisementHours later, Trump tweeted a furious, four-page letter he had sent WHO director-general Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, in which he threatened to make the "temporary freeze of United States funding to the
In the letter, Trump also accused the WHO of favoring China, and censured it for not praising his own response to the US outbreak.
China said this was an attempt to smear China and shift focus away from Trump's own mishandling of the US crisis.
AdvertisementThe contrast was clear. China was given an opportunity to — however cynically — present itself as a calm, peaceful leader. Meanwhile, the US appeared petty and reluctant to engage.
It is not hard to see China angling to fill the power vacuum Trump is leaving at the WHO, which could help it walk away relatively unscathed from the pandemic that began inside its borders.
Read the original article on Business Insider
Popular on BI
- Best thermal printers for print bills, receipts and tickets
- India incurred a loss of $87 billion due to climate-related hazards last year
- India’s top 10 favourite cryptocurrencies in October 2021
- Delhi schools and colleges to reopen from November 1, says Deputy CM
- Looking to invest in Nykaa’s IPO? Here’s what analysts are saying