Lawmakers found a new excuse to not pass a stock trading ban before the midterms: not enough time to read the bill text
Advertisement
Bryan Metzger
Sep 30, 2022, 08:17 IST
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer outside the Capitol on July 29, 2022.Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call via Getty Images
The House was set to vote on a Pelosi-backed bill to ban members of Congress from trading stocks.
But the legislation had a major loophole, and leaders now say members need more time to read the bill.
Advertisement
The House of Representatives will not vote this week on a new bill backed by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to ban lawmakers and other senior government officials from owning and trading stocks.
That all but assures Congress will not act on the issue before the November midterm elections, despite Pelosi's prior expectation that the bill could reach the floor this month.
The excuse? Not enough time to read the far-reaching 26-page bill, the text of which was released — after almost six months of radio silence — by the Committee on House Administration late on Tuesday night.
"I don't think this bill was written to pass the House," said Democratic Rep. Abigail Spanberger of Virginia, who first introduced her own bipartisan bill to ban congressional stock trading more than two years ago with Republican Rep. Chip Roy of Texas.
But one of those few lawmakers happens to be House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, according to somereports. Hoyer, who controls the floor schedule, confirmed to Insider that there will be no vote this week.
"First of all, I haven't read the language. It just came out 36 hours ago," he said at the Capitol on Thursday, declining to confirm that he'd oppose the bill. "I don't know, we'll take a look at it."
Advertisement
'Punt, after punt, after punt'
At their weekly press conference on Thursday, House Democratic Caucus Chair Rep. Hakeem Jeffries of New York and Vice Chair Rep. Pete Aguilar of California seemed to indicate little urgency for holding a vote on the part of rank-and-file members.
"The issue was not raised in the caucus meeting today," said Jeffries.
But the duo also sought to downplay the idea that significant parts of the caucus — perhaps the dozens with significant stock holdings themselves — might actually be opposed to the idea.
"I've heard from members who aren't supportive of the bill. It's a thin margin. Whether members would vote against the bill is a separate conversation," said Aguilar. "They're going through the bill. The final bill text was just released recently."
Spanberger said while she agrees that reviewing the text is important, the timing of the text's release indicated that leadership was "endeavoring to delay a vote on any bill" that would enact a stock-trade ban.
Advertisement
"It seems like it's been a punt, after punt, after punt, distraction after distraction after distraction," she said.
Roy, who's pledged to vote against the Pelosi-backed bill primarily due to concerns about the rushed, top-down process for putting forward the expansive bill, told reporters outside the House chamber that he thought there were "a lot of efforts to purposely make this die under its own weight."
Democratic Rep. Andy Kim of New Jersey, whose own bill to ban stock trading is just as expansive and wide-ranging as what Democratic leadership proposed, offered a more conciliatory assessment of the situation.
"The fact that we have something on paper now, that people can react to in a more unified way, I think we're moving forward," he said. "I've learned that timing in this building is not something you should ever set your clock to. There's always delays in votes, there's always other things that are happening."
The House could still take action on the legislation in the so-called "lame duck" session after the midterms, when Democratic senators may introduce their own consensus bill on the issue. But with the election in the rearview mirror, lawmakers might be less susceptible to public pressure.
Advertisement
Spanberger balked when asked about attempting to amend the Pelosi-backed bill, saying she'd prefer to get "back to the basics" of the matter. "They brought in a whole host of new elements," she said.
Roy was even more blunt, criticizing the way the House of Representatives is run under Pelosi, where open debate on amendments rarely takes place on the floor.
"You got to go through all the frickin' cardinals who run their committees, and ask permission, then they decide which amendments to get in their pre-cooked scheme on running the universe," he said. "So, you know, no, I can't offer an amendment."
{{}}
NewsletterSIMPLY PUT - where we join the dots to inform and inspire you. Sign up for a weekly brief collating many news items into one untangled thought delivered straight to your mailbox.
Sen. Dianne Feinstein chides staffers as they race to prep her for stopgap government funding vote: 'I don't even know what that is'
Ginni Thomas, wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, told the Jan. 6 investigators she still believes the 2020 election was stolen, committee chairman tells CNN
A Russian oligarch's girlfriend was charged with lying to the feds while trying to enter the US to give birth to their baby