Trump and family deny responsibility for fudging Trump Org numbers in previously unseen deposition video shown by New York AG at trial

Advertisement
Trump and family deny responsibility for fudging Trump Org numbers in previously unseen deposition video shown by New York AG at trial
Former President Donald Trump appears in the courtroom with his lawyers for the start of his civil fraud trial in New York State Supreme Court. Brendan McDermid-Pool/Getty
  • Donald Trump showed up in court Monday for the first day of his civil fraud trial in New York.
  • AG lawyers showed deposition videos of him, Eric, and Don Jr. shirking responsibility for fudged numbers.
Advertisement

Lawyers from the New York Attorney General's office confronted former President Donald Trump in court Monday, showing a previously unseen deposition video where he denies responsibility for the property valuations in his own company.

In the video, shown on the enormous TV screens in the downtown Manhattan courtroom, Trump was asked who at the Trump Organization was tasked with making sure the family company's financial statements abided by GAAP — or generally accepted accounting principles.

Was it Allen Weisselberg, the Trump Organization's chief financial officer?

"I would say yes," Trump answered.

It was Weisselberg who made sure properties were valued according to GAAP, he said.

Advertisement

Moments earlier, Kevin C. Wallace, the attorney general's office lawyer presenting the opening statement, had shown a different deposition video of Weisselberg. Another lawyer from the attorney general's office asked if he was familiar with GAAP.

"I never took the CPA exam, never studied for it," Weisselberg said, explaining he wasn't familiar with GAAP. "So I don't know all the components for it."

The juxtaposition got to the heart of New York Attorney General Letitia James's lawsuit against Trump, Eric Trump, Donald Trump Jr., Weisselberg, and executive Jeff McConney. Someone is lying about how the financial statements were prepared, and that proves the defendants were acting with an intent to defraud, the attorney general's lawsuit says.

Trump and family deny responsibility for fudging Trump Org numbers in previously unseen deposition video shown by New York AG at trial
Donald Trump / Letitia JamesGetty Images

By appearing in court, Trump is dodging another deposition

Trump's personal appearance in the courtroom was arranged at the last minute. Aside from his four criminal arraignments and bookings where he was required to appear in court or in jail, he has avoided showing up at hearings and trials for his numerous legal cases. Even during his civil trial this spring, where a federal jury in New York found him liable for sexually abusing and defaming E. Jean Carroll, Trump did not personally show up.

With his appearance in the New York court, Trump has been able to dodge — for now — a deposition he was scheduled to take in a lawsuit against Michael Cohen, a former company executive and personal lawyer, now turned bitter enemy. Cohen is scheduled to testify as a witness against Trump later in the New York trial, which is set to last until December 22.

Advertisement

Before entering the courtroom Monday morning, Trump stood outside and derided James' case as politically motivated, calling the case a "scam."

"We have a racist attorney general who is a horror show, who ran on the basis that she was going to get Trump before she even knew anything about me," he said.

A few moments later, he walked into the room, where James sat in the front row of the gallery. Trump clutched his stomach after walking by.

Joining the former president in person was Eric Trump, who runs day-to-day operations at the Trump Organization, as well as a passel of Trumpworld characters including his 2024 presidential campaign staffers Jason Miller and Steven Cheung. The two appeared to fidget with their hands and doze off during the morning's legal arguments from Wallace and Chris Kise, the former solicitor general of Florida who presented Trump's opening statement. New York Justice Arthur Egoron, who's presiding over the case, largely banned cell phone use in the courtroom.

The attorney general's lawsuit alleges Trump, along with his two eldest sons and other executives of the Trump Organization, participated in a fraud scheme by inflating the values of the company's properties, which enabled them to get favorable bank loans.

Advertisement

James asked the judge to disgorge them of allegedly ill-gotten gains, issue $250 million in penalties, and permanently ban the former president, Donald Trump Jr., and Eric Trump from running a New York-based corporation ever again.

Much of the lawsuit was resolved in late September when Justice Arthur Engoron issued a summary judgment decision that granted James victories in much of her case, but there are still six counts to be decided during the trial. Transcripts of large swathes of the depositions were included in the motions for summary judgment over the past several weeks.

A family affair

During Wallace's opening argument, he also showed deposition videos of Eric Trump and Donald Trump Jr.

Eric Trump, though he has largely taken over the company since his father took the office of the presidency in 2017, said he couldn't remember working on financial statements, which were crucial for getting loans from banks.

"I don't think I have had any involvement in statements of financial condition, to the best of my knowledge," he said in his deposition.

Advertisement

Donald Trump Jr. said in his deposition that he "probably" became familiar with GAAP during "Accounting 101 at Wharton."

Asked what he remembered about those generally accepted accounting principles, he smiled.

"That they're generally accepted," he said to laughter.

The Trump Organization executive said he had never been employed in a position that required him to apply GAAP to his work.

Speaking before opening statements began, Engoron gave a preview of the case. The trial is being conducted without a jury, meaning Engoron would personally decide whether Trump and his posse would be held liable, and what any punishment would be.

Advertisement

"This case has esteemed counsel. On one side, we have an attorney general. On the other, a former solicitor general," he quipped. "In the middle, we have me, a generalist, someone who knows a little about a lot."

But, he said, he does know a lot about fraud. And he would be paying close attention to each side's arguments.

{{}}