Axel Springer just scored a huge victory in court against Adblock Plus

Advertisement

germany

Shaun Botterill/Getty Images

PARIS, FRANCE - JUNE 21: Germany fans show their support prior to the UEFA EURO 2016 Group C match between Northern Ireland and Germany at Parc des Princes on June 21, 2016 in Paris, France.

A German court on Friday handed publisher Axel Springer - the parent company of Business Insider, Bild, and Die Welt - a material win in its fight against ad blockers, which users can install on computers or mobile devices to prevent advertising from being shown.

Advertisement

The appeals court in Cologne on Friday banned German startup Eyeo, the parent company of Adblock Plus, from charging Axel Springer a fee to appear on its "Acceptable Ads" whitelist.

The whitelist lets companies that submit advertising to Eyeo, which is not deemed to be annoying or intrusive, to have their ads served to Adblock Plus' users.

Complimentary Tech Event
Transform talent with learning that works
Capability development is critical for businesses who want to push the envelope of innovation.Discover how business leaders are strategizing around building talent capabilities and empowering employee transformation.Know More

Large entities, such as Google and Criteo, are charged 30% of the additional revenue created for having those ads whitelisted.

Now, the court ruled that Axel Springer will not have to pay to appear on the whitelist, which could open the floodgates to the many other large entities taking Eyeo to court on this matter too - at least in Germany, where 25.3% of internet users have ad blockers, according to a 2015 report from PageFair and Adobe.

Advertisement

In a blog post, Eyeo says it plans to appeal the ruling: "And we're confident that Germany's supreme court (the Bundesgerichtshof) will overturn this one part of the decision."

The appeals court ruled it did not have objections to ad blocker usage, but agreed with Axel Springer that the Acceptable Ads list arrangement was in breach of German unfair competition law.

Adblock Plus explained in its blog post:

Axel Springer's attorneys used this sub-clause [Paragraph 4a UWG] to justify their secondary request to the court: "to ban an adblocker if that ad blocker allows ads that meet certain criteria and requires that Springer [emphasis mine] needs to pay a fee for it."

Now, the Acceptable Ads initiative to which this obliquely refers is completely fair and utterly transparent. What it provides is a way for publishers and advertisers, if they so choose, to reach ad blockers on their terms.

Advertisement

Last September, a German court said that Adblock Plus does not breach laws on competition, copyright, or market dominance - the arguments first brought by Axel Springer, which went on to appeal.

(Reporting by Lara O'Reilly, Business Insider and from Reuters: Nikola Rotscheroth; Writing by Harro ten Wolde; Editing by Georgina Prodhan)

Disclosure: Axel Springer is Business Insider's parent company.