A California judge ordered OAN's parent company to pay $250,000 in Rachel Maddow and MSNBC's legal fees after its failed defamation suit
- A judge ordered far-right outlet
OAN's parent company to pay $250,000 in Rachel Maddowand MSNBC's legal fees. Herring Networksin 2019 sued MSNBC and Maddow for defamation after the anchor said OAN was "paid Russian propaganda."
- A judge decided against Herring Networks, ruling there was "no set of facts that could support a claim for defamation."
A California judge ordered Herring Networks, the parent company of the far-right cable
In July 2019, Herring Networks filed a defamation suit in a San Diego court against Maddow, Comcast, MSNBC, and NBCUniversal
Herring sued MSNBC and Maddow for $10 million after she made the comments during a July 22, 2019, broadcast of "The Rachel Maddow Show." Her claims followed a report from The Daily Beast that reported an employee of the pro-Trump network also worked for the Russian-owned Sputnik News, as The Associated Press previously reported.
"Their on-air US politics reporter is paid by the Russian government to produce propaganda for that government," Maddow said at the time.
Lawyers for MSNBC and Maddow countersued under California's Anti-Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation statute, which allows for defendants to file to strike a motion on the basis that "any act . . . in furtherance of the person's right of petition or free speech under the United States Constitution or the California Constitution in connection with a public issue."
US District Judge Cynthia Bashant last year dismissed Herring Networks lawsuits with prejudice, deciding there were "no set of facts that could support a claim for defamation based on Maddow's statement," according to the report.
Under the anti-SLAPP law, defendants who successfully have their suit tossed out are entitled to have at least a portion of their legal fees used for their defense covered by the party that brought the dismissed suit.
Herring Networks was ordered to pay Maddow and MSNBC's legal fees for about 363 hours of work by lawyers that totaled $247,667.50, according to the report. They were also awarded an additional $10,724 for hours that were billed by paralegals, Law&Crime reported.
"This ruling reflects that One America News' lawsuit is totally baseless, and we expect to continue to prevail on appeal," an MSNBC spokesperson said in a statement following the ruling.
Charles Herring, the president of Herring Networks, told Law&Crime in a statement that it was in the process of appealing the ruling.
"We're pleased that the fees were reduced by nearly a third by the court," he told the outlet. "The case is currently under appeal and we're highly confident that we'll receive a favorable and just ruling in the US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit."
- Bharti Airtel's revenues soar by 22% year on year, net profit 165% in Q4FY22
- Volkswagen Virtus vs Skoda Slavia: Specifications and features compared
- LIC makes a weak debut on exchanges today: Here is what analysts have to say
- Top free iPhone and iPad games for all age groups
- Best phones under ₹50,000 in India