The $100 million Andy Ruiz vs. Anthony Joshua fight is 'masking a darker truth' in Saudi Arabia, and boxing is burying its head in the sand
- The heavyweight boxing fight between Andy Ruiz Jr. and Anthony Joshua on Saturday is Saudi Arabia's attempt at "sportswashing," Amnesty International told Business Insider.
- The human rights organization said that hosting the high-profile rematch is "an effort to 'reposition' the very damaged Saudi brand though the reflected glamour, excitement, and prestige of top-tier sport."
- It added that Saudi Arabia has a public image problem because it is a society "where journalists face flogging for speaking negatively about the King; where children receive the death penalty for attending pro-democracy protests; and where public beheadings are a routine part of life."
- The Ruiz Jr. vs. Joshua fight this weekend is therefore "masking a darker truth," it said.
- Boxing is burying its head in the Saudi sand by going there. The event's promoter Eddie Hearn told Business Insider that the main reason for doing so was because of the money on offer. Joshua, for example, will reportedly receive a career-high payday of $85 million.
- "Boxing is not the most ethical sport in the world" because of what happens in the ring, Hearn said.
- "This is a fight. This is the most barbaric of sports where people can die. Boxing trumps everything in terms of what's right and what's wrong."
- Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.
The $100 million Andy Ruiz Jr. vs. Anthony Joshua fight on Saturday is "masking a darker truth" in Saudi Arabia, and boxing is burying its head in the sand by holding a massive event there regardless.
That is the opinion of Felix Jakens, a spokesman for the human rights organization Amnesty International, who told Business Insider that Saudi Arabia is using top-tier sport, in this case a unified heavyweight world championship fight, as a way of eclipsing negative headlines with positive ones.
"The intention is that people start to associate Saudi Arabia with excitement and sport - reconceiving it as an outward-looking, open place to visit," Jakens, Amnesty International UK's Head of Campaigns, said.
"This new public face is masking a darker truth, one where journalists face flogging for speaking negatively about the King; where children receive the death penalty for attending pro-democracy protests; and where public beheadings are a routine part of life.
"That's the Saudi Arabia [which] Anthony Joshua and Eddie Hearn are visiting - and they should be prepared to say so."
The only problem is they are not saying so. Not really.
Two months ago, Joshua simply said that he is "there to fight," according to The Guardian.
He added that he could act as a spokesman, building a relationship with Saudi Arabia instead of "accusing, pointing fingers, and shouting from Great Britain."
Speaking to Business Insider last week, Hearn said that the nation "definitely has its issues that it needs to overcome." But he stressed his No.1 priority is to maximize the earnings of his star client - Joshua.
Those earnings, according to Daily Mail boxing reporter Jeff Powell, will see Joshua bank a career-high payday of $85 million. Ruiz Jr. will earn approximately $13 million.
In this respect, Hearn has done his job.
'Boxing is not the most ethical sport'
Hearn told us that "boxing is not the most ethical sport in the world" because of what happens in the ring. "You're not looking into the sport. This is boxing. This is a fight. This is the most barbaric of sports where people can die. Boxing trumps everything in terms of what's right and what's wrong," he said.
"You can't say to a fighter … imagine I went to Joshua, 'This is the deal for Saudi,' which I did, and he went, and everyone says, 'When we going?' But then I say, 'I'm afraid I'm not comfortable.'
"You've got to live in the real world here. Why do you think the WWE go there? Why do you think the European Tour [golf] are going there? They're getting paid a load of money."
Hearn said there are two ways for his sport to generate huge sums of money. You can either build interest in an event so it is a must-see pay-per-view show, like the 2015 fight between Floyd Mayweather and Manny Pacquiao. Or you go to a country where they pay you a massive site fee.
Places like Madison Square Garden in New York, the MGM Grand in Las Vegas, or the 02 Arena in London carry history and prestige but when you go to places that are, in Hearn's words, "quirky and controversial," they have to compete somehow, and that is done with a payment that dwarfs what is on offer elsewhere.
"Boxing is self-sufficient in terms of demand versus money you're bringing in, but in terms of reaching that next level of earning, the only way that happens is if there's a mega, mega-fight with US pay-per-view, or there's a site fee from a new kind of territory.
"And in this instance it's Saudi. My job is to provide opportunities to my fighters. Do you think fighters who are taking part in a sport where they could potentially lose their life are particularly conscious of a current affairs issue of the country they are boxing in? With all due respect, if you think they should even consider that, then I think you're a plonker."
Interest in the Ruiz Jr. vs. Joshua rematch is massive as it will either be a case of repeat for Ruiz Jr, who won the June fight in style, or revenge for Joshua, who will be seeking to reverse the earlier result and get his career back on track.
It is a fight that would have likely sold out Wembley Arena in London, or Madison Square Garden. Perhaps, even, a neutral venue in a country that does not, in Amnesty's words, flog journalists, punish pro-democracy protesting children with death, and hold public beheadings.
So why not go to one of those venues? "What … for much less money, therefore not providing opportunity for my client?" Hearn said. "That's what you got to think about. I can't go to my client and go, 'Right, you could make life-changing money, generational wealth, but I'm uncomfortable and don't think you should do it.' They'd go, 'F--- you, I'm going.'"
Is Hearn bringing boxing a step closer to the world's worst people?
Karim Zidan, who writes about the intersection of politics and sport for The Guardian and Bloody Elbow, has reported on the relationship between world-leading mixed martial arts firm the UFC, and Ramzan Kadyrov, the Chechen warlord whose regime oversees enforced disappearances and extrajudicial killings.
There is also a "near-total repression of critics, journalists, and LGBT people" in his region, according to Human Rights Watch.
Kadyrov is seen Octagonside at some UFC events and is also rarely far from one of the UFC's greatest active athletes, the unbeaten wrestler and lightweight champion Khabib Nurmagomedov.
Zidan wrote in The Guardian last year that Kadyrov supplies fighters to the UFC through his Dagestan fight club Akhmat MMA.
Zidan said: "Kadyrov uses sports to enhance his cult of personality and bolster his reputation as a benevolent leader who enjoys sports."
He also wrote: "The UFC is aware of the controversy surrounding the Chechen dictator and the UFC fighters who represent him, [but] the promotion has chosen to remain silent regarding this potential public relations nightmare."
Business Insider asked Hearn if he's bringing his sport one step closer to people like this, considering Saudi Arabia's record of human rights abuses.
Earlier this year, Insider's Bill Bostock revealed that Saudi Arabia runs a huge, sinister online database of women that men use to track them and stop them from running away. It was an app available on Google and Apple but both later stopped hosting it on their platforms. Saudi Arabia, too, updated its laws because of the reporting.
Hearn said Saudi Arabia definitely has issues, but women "can drive on their own, attend events, and that there's women travelling to the show, both from outside the country and internally."
He said the country's "human rights record is not good" but Kadyrov is shadier than the Saudis. "It's not underworld, is it? I know they've got their issues, but it is government, and it is royalty.
"I've been promoting boxing for 10 years. I've been around boxing for 30 years. I've seen some dodgy characters but I've not seen any underworld involvement. When you look at that guy [Kadyrov], that's serious level. That's serious level, isn't he."
Amnesty International has a message regarding what the Saudi government is like, though. "It's a government which prefers to lock up its critics rather than listen to them," Jakens said.
This [event] is an attempt at 'sportswashing' - an effort to 'reposition' the very damaged Saudi brand though the prestige of top-tier sport.
He added that Hearn is right to say the country allows women to drive without fear of arrest and that there's an easing of its "guardianship system," meaning women over 21 can travel without the permission of a man.
"But there's still fundamental discrimination against women in the country. Women still require a male guardian's approval to marry. If they've been sent to prison they still need their guardian's permission to be even be released. There is no prohibition against marital or statutory rape; and rape victims are frequently charged with adultery.
"And a number of the very brave women activists who campaigned - at some considerable risk - for the right to drive have, for their pains, been arrested and charged in relation to their human rights work. These include Loujain al-Hathloul, Samar Badawi, and Nassima al-Sada.
"This [boxing event] is an attempt at 'sportswashing' - an effort to 'reposition' the very damaged Saudi brand though the reflected glamour, excitement, and prestige of top-tier sport.
"We've never said that Joshua or Ruiz should refuse to fight in Riyadh," Jakens added. "We've just called on them to show some awareness and speak out about the human rights situation that is, after all, very likely the underlying reason for the fight taking place in Saudi Arabia in the first place."