The New York Times editorial board rips apart 'brazen tax dodgers'
Through a process called inversion, American companies merge with smaller companies located in regions where taxes are lower, like Ireland, to effectively change their "tax nationality," and pay lower rates while maintaining majority American ownership and operations.
Tax inversions were commonplace in the 1990s, Business Insider's Portia Crowe reports, but have come under increased scrutiny in the past few years as a number of high-profile inversions took place,
The New York Times specifically names Pfizer, which merged with Allergan to become Irish-based, and Johnson Controls - which sold itself this week to Tyco International, another Irish company - as the most brazen tax dodgers.
Johnson Controls' president previously asked Congress for a significant bailout during the financial crisis in 2008, which came at the expense of American taxpayers, The New York Times points out.
Patriotism aside, there are substantial financial benefits to inversion. The combined federal and state corporate tax rate for the US is about 40%. That's up to 15% higher than the average among the Organization for Economic Cooperation's member states, reports Crain's.
American corporations must manage their tax burdens efficiently in order to remain competitive, as many countries around the world are further reducing corporate tax rates to encourage investment, according to Crain's.
"Inversions are not unpatriotic," Paul Dailey, a partner at Citrin Cooperman, an accounting firm told Crain's. "If the rules are there, corporate taxpayers are obligated to consider them."
But to Republicans in Congress, corporate inversions are simple proof that the tax code needs reforming. While The New York Times concedes that this may be true, it says inversions should not be allowed to proceed to prove a "partisan point."
The Times suggests that because Congress has largely been unwilling to reign in corporate inversions, consumers and advocacy groups should identify and publicly name inverted companies, and seek alternative products.
The newspapers also recommended that the White House should make it more difficult for inverted companies to win lucrative federal contracts.
Read the rest of The New York Times story here.
- A couple accidentally shipped their cat in an Amazon return package. It arrived safely 6 days later, hundreds of miles away.
- A centenarian who starts her day with gentle exercise and loves walks shares 5 longevity tips, including staying single
- 2 states where home prices are falling because there are too many houses and not enough buyers
- "To sit and talk in the box...!" Kohli's message to critics as RCB wrecks GT in IPL Match 45
- 7 Nutritious and flavourful tiffin ideas to pack for school
- India's e-commerce market set to skyrocket as the country's digital economy surges to USD 1 Trillion by 2030
- Top 5 places to visit near Rishikesh
- Indian economy remains in bright spot: Ministry of Finance
- JNK India IPO allotment date
- JioCinema New Plans
- Realme Narzo 70 Launched
- Apple Let Loose event
- Elon Musk Apology
- RIL cash flows
- Charlie Munger
- Feedbank IPO allotment
- Tata IPO allotment
- Most generous retirement plans
- Broadcom lays off
- Cibil Score vs Cibil Report
- Birla and Bajaj in top Richest
- Nestle Sept 2023 report
- India Equity Market