Spotify: Exclusive music is 'bad for fans' and 'bad for artists'
This seems like good business in the short-term, but not everyone agrees that it's good for fans or artists.Spotify, in particular, has come forward criticizing the practice.
Pandora, while not overtly critical, hasn't exactly embraced exclusives either.Pandora CPO Chris Phillips told Business Insider that when he thinks about exclusives, it's mostly around things like live events, not recordings. "I do think that there's an opportunity, for example, to have a live-streaming event that could be kind of exclusively on a platform," he said.
But as far as having an album that exclusively exists on one streaming service, like Kanye's has so far (Rihanna's is now widely available), Phillips doesn't think it makes much sense for artists."I think on the artist incentive side, it's pretty tough to keep your music on just one service, because you're limiting your reach, especially if you're a new artist."The big change with Tidal might be equity. Both Kanye and Rihanna own an undisclosed piece of the company, and we don't know what kind of deal Jay Z offered them for exclusivity, permanent or temporary.
Kanye might also be getting other benefits besides equity and Jay Z's goodwill. According to Kanye's Twitter, Tidal is funding a lot of his "scripted content ideas."
- COVID-19: These are the most affected cities in India with the highest number of cases
- ISRO partners with France to launch India's first human spaceflight mission Gaganyaan
- Total TV Owning Households grew by 6.9% to reach 210 million in 2020: BARC Report
- Flipkart acquires Cleartrip in an effort to cement its position in the travel booking segment
- Twitter details plan to understand if its algorithms are causing ‘unintentional harms’