Boston just became the latest city to ban use of facial recognition technology
Bostonjust banned the use of facial recognitiontechnology by city agencies. It is the second-largest city in the world to do so, behind San Francisco.
- The Boston City Council voted unanimously to ban the technology in the city Wednesday. The move also bans city officials from asking a third party to carry out facial recognition.
- The legislation was spurred by multiple studies that have shown facial recognition algorithms are more likely to misidentify people of color than white people, as well as
View all Offers
Amazon Brand - Solimo Trundle Solid Sheesham Wood Single Bed (Teak Finish)₹ 8799₹ 15000Buy On
Amazon Brand - Solimo Alen 5 Seater Fabric RHS L Shape Sofa Set (Grey)₹ 27999₹ 39000Buy On
AmazonBasics Full Back Executive Chair (Black, Leather)₹ 9999₹ 10000Buy On
AmazonBasics Platform Foldable Steel Bed Frame, Black, Single₹ 4599₹ 7000Buy On
Amazon Brand - Solimo Biela Single Seater Fabric Recliner (Brown)₹ 15999₹ 21999Buy On
Boston's city council voted unanimously to ban the use of facial recognition technology by the city Wednesday, WBUR first reported.
The move comes on the heels of pressure from civil liberties advocates and academics who have pointed to faults in facial recognition algorithms. A sweeping federal study last year found that most major facial recognition software is more likely to misidentify people of color than white people.
The Boston ordinance comes the same week that a Black man from Detroit came forward, who says he was arrested and wrongfully accused of theft after a police facial recognition scan matched him to crime scene footage. He was later released from police custody without charges.
Boston is the second-largest city to ban facial recognition, after San Francisco. The ban will prevent any city employee from using facial recognition or from asking a third party to use the technology. Five other municipalities in Massachussetts have also banned the technology.
"In a time where we're seeing so much direct action in the form of marches and protests for rights, any kind of surveillance technology that could be used to essentially chill free speech or ... more or less monitor activism or activists is dangerous," Boston city councilor Ricardo Arollo said Wednesday.
Boston's police department had already disavowed the technology and said it hasn't used it, citing concerns that it's unreliable.
Amid mounting public criticism of facial recognition technology, several major
- HUL spent Rs 1,193 crore on advertising between October and December 2021
- Rohit Sharma, Rishabh Pant and Ravichandran Ashwin included in ICC Men's Test team of the Year 2021
- One in five Urban Company professionals took home at least ₹38,000 a month, claims the company
- Rythu Bandhu scheme - Telangana government deposits ₹7,400 crore into the bank accounts of 62 lakh farmers
- As tepid two wheeler sales hurt Bajaj Auto’s profitability, stock slides 4%