TIM COOK: Actually, there's plenty of data the FBI can use to spy on people

Advertisement

Apple CEO Tim Cook has gone public again with a big, splashy cover story in Time, where he talks about Apple's battle with the FBI over whether to unlock an iPhone used by one of the shooters in the San Bernardino, California, killings.

Advertisement

Most of the story repeats the same public arguments Apple has made since the FBI's demand dropped about a month ago.

But Cook did make one new philosophical point in Apple's case against the FBI: Law enforcement doesn't necessarily need direct access to devices when people are freely giving away so much personal information to social networks and other services that store data in the cloud - Apple included.

Complimentary Tech Event
Transform talent with learning that works
Capability development is critical for businesses who want to push the envelope of innovation.Discover how business leaders are strategizing around building talent capabilities and empowering employee transformation.Know More

The FBI says Apple's stance on encryption means the company wants to "go dark" and remove any possibility that law enforcement can get its hands on the data of a suspected criminal, no matter what.

But Cook countered by pointing to all the data that's already available to the FBI.

Advertisement

For example, with the proper warrant Apple will give law enforcement access to data stored on iCloud, which can store iPhone backups that include everything from text messages to contacts to photos.

Here's what Cook said, according to a transcript of Time's interview:

And so my only point is, going dark is not - this is a crock. No one's going dark. I mean really, it's fair to say that if you send me a message and it's encrypted, it's fair to say they can't get that without going to you or to me, unless one of us has it in our cloud at this point. That's fair to say. But we shouldn't all be fixated just on what's not available. We should take a step back and look at the total that's available.

Because there's a mountain of information about us. I mean there's so much. Anyway, I'm not an intelligence person. But I just look at it and it's a mountain of data.

In other words, a lot of the data law enforcement typically wants in cases like this is already available without rewriting a new version of iOS to break into the phone. Apple is willing to cross that line. But it's not willing to allow direct access to iOS.

Advertisement

NOW WATCH: Obama on encryption: "It's fetishizing our phones above every other value"